General questions

The living will can only be accessed directly from your member account, means only when you are logged in, except via QR code (and sbl.onl link) on your member card or via the emergency information on your smartphone. This is for an emergency and allows medical staff to access your living will without being logged in.

However, medical personnel do not access your living will directly via this link; instead, when the aforementioned link is called up, it first generates a different code that is only valid once and is time-limited, and only with this code do emergency personnel access your living will. This way it is ensured that as a “not logged in” person you cannot simply “browse” through all the living wills, which you could do if the link on your member card could be seen directly 1:1 in the browser window. But this is not possible thanks to this sophisticated system – access to all other living wills is denied.

But of course this link expires when it has been used, since it is valid only once, or for a limited time. Only when you scan it again will you generate a new valid access. If you use this old again, you will correctly receive an error message. If, unexpectedly, you also receive such an error message when you legitimately want to access your living will, you must delete your browser cache.

The purpose of this emergency code is to allow medical personnel to access your relevant medical data even if you are unconscious. Of course, this means that ANYONE who scans this code will be able to get directly to your living will, which is why you usually keep it confidential. But, of course, you want access to be granted whenever it is necessary.

The important thing to remember is that this code is not valid indefinitely, and starting from it, no one can access living wills of other members, which is guaranteed as described above.

The legal situation is diffuse in all countries, but I have not seen a law anywhere that would explicitly prohibit a clinic from leaving the choice of blood donor, or the type of donor blood, up to the patient. And we have hired several lawyers to help us find these laws – they have not found one.

There is no medical reason to use only Red Cross blood, or to deny you from bringing a potential blood donor with the appropriate blood type yourself. If your doctor tells you otherwise, he is lying or does not know better. To say that it is not feasible or recommended for a medical reason stamps all clinics and doctors who have always practiced this as unprofessional or idiots. In many parts of the third world, it is common for patients to be asked to bring a relative as a blood donor. It is a typical Western arrogance to think that only we here in the so-called West have a highly developed health care system. Countries like South Africa, for example, even have some of the best hospitals in the world.

Often, especially from German hospitals, arguments like “there may be psychological conflicts if you have the blood of a relative” or similar absurdities are used – all excuses to be able to maintain the status quo.

So there is actually no reason to deny you this basic right. Why do they do it then? We can only speculate here, since no one in charge will admit what it’s all about, namely a lot of money (the big big money), power, and pushing through an agenda that has brought us the last 2 years of “pandemic” with all its nonsensical, destructive and sometimes life-threatening consequences (e.g. vaccination side effects on a scale never seen before).

As an example of this agenda, here is a statement by Ann Bressington, former member of the Western Australian Legislative Council. An example from Australia, but one that can be applied 1:1 to virtually every country in the world. You can of course call this a “conspiracy theory” and ignore it, but there are dozens of such genuine statements (formerly disguised as “secret societies”, today easily found on the Internet) both from politicians and from the self-appointed leaders of this “New World Order” themselves, e.g. Klaus Schwab’s book “Covid 19: The great reset”.
https://safeblood.cz/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/ANN_Bressington.mp4

Insist on your human right, sue the clinic, find another one – do whatever it takes to prevent getting mRNA contaminated blood transfused. We’re on the front lines fighting for it. Starting in September, you will find a database of our Medical Partners in your member area – so you will be able to find a clinic online that will grant you your basic rights – but you will also see there which clinics will deny you that.

Because I refuse to go along with the whole vaccination fascism that is going on in the world at the moment. For me, vaccinated and unvaccinated people are first and foremost human beings, none more valuable than the other. Sure, we distinguish these two groups for purely medical reasons, because we don’t want vaccinated blood. And one may ask the question, whether it makes sense, if a vaccinated person wants unvaccinated blood.

We must not forget two things here: firstly, many people have only been vaccinated under inhuman pressure and would never do it again, and secondly, I am totally convinced, that the less graphene oxides and spike proteins you give your body, the better it is. No vaccination super, one vaccination better than two and so on. We are all just human and we make mistakes. I do not punish anyone for the mistake of being vaccinated, and if you think that vaccinated people have no place here, on the contrary, you are out of place here.